<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AspectJ is better then AspectWerkz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://misko.hevery.com/2008/06/26/aspectj-is-better-then-aspectwerkz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://misko.hevery.com/2008/06/26/aspectj-is-better-then-aspectwerkz/</link>
	<description>Testability Explorer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:05:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Dawnson</title>
		<link>http://misko.hevery.com/2008/06/26/aspectj-is-better-then-aspectwerkz/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Dawnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhevery.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-866</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys,How can I unit testing of aspects in AspectJ?I have no idea about this question...Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,How can I unit testing of aspects in AspectJ?I have no idea about this question&#8230;Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://misko.hevery.com/2008/06/26/aspectj-is-better-then-aspectwerkz/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhevery.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-455</guid>
		<description>AspectJ and Aspectwerkz merged back in 2005 so unless the data you used was from the time before merger, I don&#039;t think any reasonable conclusions can be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AspectJ and Aspectwerkz merged back in 2005 so unless the data you used was from the time before merger, I don&#8217;t think any reasonable conclusions can be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
